Propcache is not reproducible

[bbhtt]

Please confirm the following

• I agree to follow the aio-libs Code of Conduct

• I have checked the current issues for duplicates.

• I understand this is open source software provided for free and that I might not receive a timely response.
• I am positive I am NOT reporting a (potential) security
  vulnerability, to the best of my knowledge. (These must be shared by
  submitting this report form instead, if
  any hesitation exists.)

• I am willing to submit a pull request with reporoducers as xfailing test cases or even entire fix. (Assign this issue to me.)

Describe the bug

See diffoscope result https://freedesktop-sdk.gitlab.io/-/freedesktop-sdk/-/jobs/8191608665/artifacts/result_folder/components/python3-propcache.bst/index.html

diffoscope.txt (change to .HTML)

Seems to be from here

propcache/packaging/pep517_backend/_backend.py

Lines 224 to 228 in 73fc000

	def _in_temporary_directory(src_dir: Path) -> t.Iterator[None]:
	with TemporaryDirectory(prefix='.tmp-propcache-pep517-') as tmp_dir:
	tmp_dir_path = Path(tmp_dir)
	root_tmp_dir_path = tmp_dir_path.parent
	_exclude_tmpdir_parent = partial(_exclude_dir_path, root_tmp_dir_path)

To Reproduce

Build it in freedesktop sdk https://gitlab.com/freedesktop-sdk/freedesktop-sdk/-/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md?ref_type=heads#testing-locally and compare reproducibility.

Expected behavior

It should be reproducible

Logs/tracebacks

N/A

Python Version

3.13

propcache Version

v0.2.0

OS

Linux (Freedesktop SDK)

Additional context

N/A

[webknjaz]

Yes, thiw is the same as with yarl et al. I don't remember if I settled on the way to address this yet. Need to dig into the old issues. I think some downstreams just patch it out for now.

[webknjaz]

Oh, I think I wanted to implement a PEP517 config setting with the flag..

[webknjaz]

Oh, I think I wanted to implement a PEP517 config setting with the flag..

Found where I mentioned this in the past: aio-libs/yarl#992 (comment)