We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I tried another search pattern out.
[Markus_Elfring@fedora lokal]$ printf 'else:\n X\n' | ./comby -stdin -diff -matcher .py 'else::[_\n]:[ ]X' Z
💭 May I expect that such a command should generate a simple transformation result?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do you find another search approach reasonable for such an use case?
[Markus_Elfring@fedora lokal]$ printf 'else:\n X\n' | ./comby -stdin -stdout -matcher .py 'else::[_\n]:[~\s+]X' Success Success
Sorry, something went wrong.
Will the following test result trigger also any further software development considerations? 🤔
[Markus_Elfring@fedora lokal]$ printf ' if active:\n X\n' | ./comby -stdin -stdout -matcher .py ':[ indentation]:[check~if active]::[_\n]:[ ]X' Surprise if active: X
No branches or pull requests
I tried another search pattern out.
💭 May I expect that such a command should generate a simple transformation result?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: