You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 22, 2023. It is now read-only.
This means that typechecking doesn't happen during development, which obviously I can see the arguments for, in that it's gonna allow for faster iteration, but personally I'd prefer the command to just fail and force my team to fix their types. I don't know if that's a minority opinion, but if so I would appreciate this at least being somehow optional, perhaps by setting some field in package.json, given that that's read from anyway?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
https://github.com/oclif/config/blame/a3e3052c4acfece3acd66bab5a13ba7a32f7f6f9/src/ts-node.ts#L42
This means that typechecking doesn't happen during development, which obviously I can see the arguments for, in that it's gonna allow for faster iteration, but personally I'd prefer the command to just fail and force my team to fix their types. I don't know if that's a minority opinion, but if so I would appreciate this at least being somehow optional, perhaps by setting some field in
package.json
, given that that's read from anyway?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: