[BugFix] SpillableHashJoinProbeOperator memory consumption for building partition hash table

[IHEII]

Why I'm doing:

Fixes #56491

SpillableHashJoinProbeOperator will take much memory to restore/rebuild the partition hash table when DoP is elevated. Although there is a Memory Resource Manager that could help to control the memory usage in SpillableHashJoinProbeOperators ( by limiting the size of selected partition to smaller than 2 * spill_mem_table_size ), Memory Resource Manager hasn't considered multi-operators.

Considering Q97 in TPC-DS, it will take about 3-4 GB to rebuild the partition hash table at a time

Memory is calculated as below:

56 (DoP) * 4 MB (size of the hash table in this case) * 16 (partition from build operator)) = 3.5 GB

This PR will introduce a config called spillHashJoinProbeOpMaxBytes to help reduce memory consumption when building the partition hash table by limiting memory usage across all probe operators.

What I'm doing:

Fixes #56491

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.4
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

[github-actions]

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 1 / 1 (100.00%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	com/starrocks/qe/SessionVariable.java	1	1	100.00%	[]

[github-actions]

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

✅ pass : 21 / 21 (100.00%)

file detail

	path	covered_line	new_line	coverage	not_covered_line_detail
🔵	be/src/exec/pipeline/hashjoin/spillable_hash_join_probe_operator.cpp	17	17	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/exec/pipeline/hashjoin/spillable_hash_join_probe_operator.h	2	2	100.00%	[]
🔵	be/src/runtime/runtime_state.h	2	2	100.00%	[]