-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
ONT data model result. #810
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Even though the ONT reads have higher error rate, it should still be able to find peaks. Are you using R10 data? |
Unfortunately, I just confirmed that this test data is not R10, but for the R9 chip. |
Then hifiasm currently wouldn't work well for the old R9 data. |
Thank you for your reply. We look forward to even better performance from hifiasm |
|
I fee like most ONT reads produced after 2023 should be R10. |
Hello,
I have tested the ONT assembly mode you recently released using the UL ONT data. The result is a little strange.
The genomic material size is approximately 470M. The result genome size in hifi (180X) +UL ont (120X) mode is close to the estimate,~470M.
Only using UL ONT data in the ONT mode (--ont), the assembly size is only 14M. The kmer peak map of the data in the log has no peaks and no homologous peaks can be found.
What might be the reason for this? What other attempts can we make?
Best regards,
Ben
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: