Skip to content

Remove Sparc GNU plugin. #5158

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Remove Sparc GNU plugin. #5158

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+0 −1,825

Conversation

Rot127
Copy link
Member

@Rot127 Rot127 commented May 21, 2025

Your checklist for this pull request

  • I've read the guidelines for contributing to this repository.
  • I made sure to follow the project's coding style.
  • I've documented every RZ_API function and struct this PR changes.
  • I've added tests that prove my changes are effective (required for changes to RZ_API).
  • I've updated the Rizin book with the relevant information (if needed).

Detailed description

Simple removal

Test plan

All green

Closing issues

Ticks a box in #2704

@Rot127 Rot127 requested a review from wargio as a code owner May 21, 2025 17:46
@Rot127 Rot127 mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2025
Open
10 tasks
wargio
wargio requested changes May 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@wargio wargio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

requires an alternative before we can merge this.

@notxvilka notxvilka marked this pull request as draft May 22, 2025 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@wargio wargio wargio requested changes

Requested changes must be addressed to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
RzAnalysis RzAsm-Disassembler SPARC
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Rot127 @wargio