-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
fix: Updating the UX for hidden pages #40322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThis change introduces a new optional boolean prop Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (11)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think "hidden" property translates into ADS correctly here. We should just remove the disabled prop from the Entity item when the page is hidden.
As for the different styles for hidden, we should create a different generic prop to allow for this
@hetunandu I already removed disabled prop from the Entity item when the page is hidden. And I'm handling the different styles for hidden using isHidden prop. If you think we should name it differently, then let me know what you have in mind. |
## Description Fixing the page actions spec that was failing after [#40322](#40322) merge Fixes # ## Automation /ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE" ### 🔍 Cypress test results <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> > [!TIP] > 🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Workflow run: <https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/14587020719> > Commit: d46229a > <a href="https://internal.appsmith.com/app/cypress-dashboard/rundetails-65890b3c81d7400d08fa9ee5?branch=master&workflowId=14587020719&attempt=1" target="_blank">Cypress dashboard</a>. > Tags: `@tag.IDE` > Spec: > <hr>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 05:28:28 UTC <!-- end of auto-generated comment: Cypress test results --> ## Communication Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change? - [ ] Yes - [ ] No <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **Tests** - Updated test assertions to check the "data-subtle" attribute instead of "data-disabled" when verifying the UI state of hidden pages. - Added a tag to the test suite for improved categorization. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
Description
Updating the UX for hidden pages which is breaking on v1.68. The user is no longer able to select the hidden pages, to edit the same in edit mode. This is being fixed in this PR.
Fixes #40321
Automation
/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/14569833575
Commit: 76d359c
Cypress dashboard.
Tags:
@tag.IDE
Spec:
Mon, 21 Apr 2025 08:31:16 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Style
Refactor